Friday, March 26, 2010

My Views on Mining and the Prosperity Mine

What I Would Say to the Federal Panel


We Need Mines
We need mines. We need mines because we need stuff like cars and food and pipes to deliver our water and fuel. I have a car and a cell phone and a house, so I understand all that.

Mines are needed to get the metals and other chemicals from the ground that we need to manufacture stuff. Of this there really is no doubt.

We Don't Need Mines Anywhere and Everywhere
We just don't need mines everywhere there is a concentration metal and chemicals in the ground. In fact, we CAN'T have them everywhere. We can't have them where they would poison my drinking water, nor where they would destroy my house or my children's school.

Mines need to built: 
  • where there is both a concentration of metals and chemicals in the ground that makes them financially viable, and
  • where they do not impose too great a cost on the people who live close to them and on the environment.
That is the test for any mine, and that is the test for Taseko Mines' proposed Prosperity Mine.

So how do you measure "too great a cost" to people? or the environment?

You Wouldn't Want it in Your Backyard

I live in One Hundred Mile House, British Columbia, and there are lots of pretty lakes here, filled with lots of fish and with backdrops of hills and mountains as pretty as you'll find anywhere. But no one who lives near 108 Mile, or 103 Mile, or Horse Lake, Sheridan Lake or Green Lake would put their lake forward as a tailings pond, or offer their beautiful lakefront property up for blasting.

Of course, our houses are collectively worth billions of dollars, and, hey, we built this country, didn't we?

So Whose Land Is It Anyway?

The people who live close to the proposed mine are, for the most part, Aboriginal people, or First Nations people. They are the original inhabitants of this land, a collection of Nations that existed long before Europeans and Asians came here and declared it to be their country.

The people that call themselves Xeni Gwet'in (pronounced Honey Geteen, more or less) have lived where they do for thousands and thousands of years. That's thousands, people, not hundreds. As in, before Christ, before the Han Dynasty, and before Moses divided the Red Sea.

If you came here from England or China or South Africa last year or decade and now call Canada home, I think we can safely say that this place is, in relative terms, not so much yours home as it is theirs.

Who Cares Whose Home It Is?

Why does it matter whose home it is? For the same reason it matters that you wouldn't accept a mine near your home, nor allow your lake to be used as a giant toxic waste dump (I mean tailings pond).

The people of the Xeni Gwet'in have been heard from but not listened to in this debate over Taseko Mines' proposed Prosperity Mine.

The Provincial Government Hasn't Listened

The provincial government rubber stamped this mine proposal without so much as a second look. I am shocked to see that a government that espouses new relationships with First Peoples could kow tow to mining with such alacrity... by which I mean they did it quick-like without so much as a glance at where they were signing.

Taseko Mines Hasn't Listened

Taseko Mines has stuck with one proposal this entire time. It has not entertained any other style of tailings facilities other than emptying, digging up and then filling in a beautiful place that doesn't belong to them. 

Taseko Mines has not listened to the Aboriginal People who would have to live with the results of their mine, not shown any respect for those who have always lived, fished, hunted and died on that land.

Taseko Mines' public relations machine has made the Xeni Gwet'in out to be a backwards and hypocritical people whose opinions don't count. Sound familiar? It is the same argument the Government of Canada and the Government of British Columbia has used since Confederation to make sure Aboriginal People do not have land or treaty rights.

It also sounds familiar to centuries of Aboriginal People who have endured both the claiming of their lands by Europeans and other newcomers, and the intended and unintended genocide of their people by successive Canadian governments.

Genocide? Never In Canada You Say?

Yes, Genocide by the definition established by the United Nations following the Second World War... a war Aboriginal People contributed to far beyond their proportion in the population, by the way.

The effects of this genocide are still evident today, after all it's been less than forty years since we stopped stealing babies from their families and making them go to residential schools where they were starved and beaten and forbidden from speaking their language or expressing their beliefs.

Why Does the Past Matter With Regards to the Prosperity Mine?

This history stuff matters today because we as British Columbians and Canadians have a choice. We can decide whether it is OK to go on not listening to First Nations people like the Xeni Gwet'in, or whether we should figure out that it isn't alright to steamroll them one more time.

If it wasn't alright to take away language and traditional ceremonies and beliefs then, it isn't alright to create this destruction today.

If it wasn't alright to believe that "our" values of hard work and entrepreneurship are superior to "their" lesser set of values then, well then it isn't alright today either. 

This is exactly the argument that Taseko Mines has gladly fomented in the press and around the water cooler in places like Williams Lake, 100 Mile House and Vancouver. It's the same old "Indians are Lazy" argument you can read about in newspapers from the 19th Century. 

The Williams Lake Tribune and writers like Tom Fletcher have been a key rallying point for this sort of explicit and implicit racism. 

I have never once heard Taseko Mines step up to plate to say tell folks to quit making this an issue about race. Presumably it works in their favor. That tells me that they'll simply do what it takes, in public and through whatever back channels they can find, to make sure they make their millions on this mine.

They don't care 'cuz they don't live there.

Folks, we either still do this in Canada or we don't. You decide.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Taseko Mines Ltd | Go Green

Taseko Mines Ltd | Go Green: "Taseko Mines Ltd
Jan
25
Anglers: unite on destruction of fishing lakes in BC
January 25th, 2010
Last July I wrote a post about the struggle the First Nations were having trying to save their lake, Tzenzaicut Lake also known as Fish Lake (situated about 125 km southwest of Williams Lake, BC) from being “used” as a dumping ground for the Prosperity Mine, a gold and copper open pit mine.� As I [...]
Continue reading about Anglers: unite on destruction of fishing lakes in BC"

Prosperity mine expected to add $4.5 billion to B.C.’s GDP

Prosperity mine expected to add $4.5 billion to B.C.’s GDP

Prosperity mine expected to add $4.5 billion to B.C.’s GDP

Taseko Mines Ltd. is countering environmental opposition to its proposed Prosperity mine southwest of Williams Lake with its own economic data claiming the mine will have a $4.5-billion impact on British Columbia’s gross domestic product over its 23-year life.

But to develop the mine, Taseko proposes turning a popular fishing lake, rainbow trout-rich Fish Lake, into a tailings pond, drawing stiff opposition from the Tsilhqot’in first nation and various environmental groups.

The economic argument is winning support in Williams Lake, 125 kilometres from the site, where the city council has made development of the mine its top priority.

But Bernie Elkins, of the Tsilhqot’in National Government, said the impact on the land outweighs the economic impact.

“We are not on-side with killing the lake,” he said, noting it is used by first nations and is popular with fishing enthusiasts. He also said the Tsilhqot’in remain unconvinced the mine will not leach toxins into the Taseko, Chilcotin and ultimately the Fraser rivers.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

New Gold Mine Could Devastate Natural Paradise | AIDA Americas

New Gold Mine Could Devastate Natural Paradise | AIDA Americas: "Photo: Acid mine drainage at US mine | Credit: Earthworks
“Paredones Amarillos” is a proposed gold mine that would be located in the Sierra la Laguna Biosphere, a pristine area recognized by the Mexican government and the United Nations for its rich biodiversity. If mining proceeds in this biosphere reserve, this natural paradise could become home to a toxic waste site.


To extract gold from the Sierra la Laguna mountains, the Canadian company, Vista Gold, proposes to carve out huge quantities of rock – each ton contains a mere gram of gold – and grind it into a sludge. Next, it will treat the sludge with cyanide, an extremely dangerous chemical. The process dissolves the gold into a liquid so it can be collected; it also produces massive amounts of toxic waste from the left-over cyanide-treated ore.

The company plans to contain this waste ore (called “tailings”) in a dam intended to store the toxic slurry forever. Unfortunately, these dams can break for various reasons, as happened at the Porco mine in Bolivia in 1996."

Legalbrief - Legal action may follow acid mine drainage

Legalbrief - Legal action may follow acid mine drainage: "��
Legal action may follow acid mine drainage
A report in today's issue of Legalbrief Environmental notes that heavy rainfall in the past few weeks has caused acid mine drainage to 'thunder' into the Witwatersrand Western Basin, causing it to spill over, carrying radioactive waste into the Tweelopiespruit and the Crocodile River system, which flows into the already polluted Hartbeespoort Dam, according to water activist Dr Anthony Turton."

The Latest News on Acid Mine Drainage

Google Blogs Alert for: "acid mine drainage"

Earthlife Africa Jhb | Test for new amd
By Rachel
However, clean-up plans must not be restricted to areas with radioactive material, but also include other areas affected by heavy metal pollution from acid mine drainage. If the plans are to be effective, mining companies will have to ...
Earthlife Africa Jhb - http://www.earthlife.org.za/
Pennsylvania To Reduce Consumers Energy Costs By $46 Million Per ...
By admin
Loyalhanna Watershed Association Inc. — $128266 for a microhydro turbine and generator to power an acid mine drainage treatment system and lighting at the Latrobe wastewater treatment plant. It will enable a pilot treatment plant to ...
Gov Monitor - http://thegovmonitor.com/
Get The Dirt Out Tuscaloosa: EPA petition could mean tighter rules
By Get The Dirt Out Tuscaloosa
"Every mine discharge in the watershed today has bacteria that's associated with acid mine drainage," Wathen said. "That is a violation of the law. "Our rights have not been observed." ...
Get The Dirt Out Tuscaloosa - http://mudbuster.blogspot.com/
Green-friendly hydro scheme gets green light | Otago Daily Times ...
They added that it would stop a large volume of acid mine drainage from entering the Ngakawau River which should improve water quality, while using that contaminated water to generate "a much needed local supply of electricity". ...
Otago Daily Times: - http://www.odt.co.nz/news